Wikiquote:Requests for adminship/StaticChristian

This discussion is finished. Please do not change it. You can add comments to another page, but not here.

Result is "not promoting". Closed early per WP:SNOW. ☺ Coppertwig (talk) 16:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

StaticChristian

End date: November 8, 2008 Hello I'm StaticChristian (talk • changes) and I think that I should be an admin. I am pretty active and I have a lot of edits. I think that I could help Simple English Wikiquote more with admin tools. I could make this place pretty good. For SIMPLE ENGLISH WIKIQUOTE. ✞Static Chr istian✞ 15:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance:Self Nomination. ✞Static Chr istian✞ 15:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Oppose

Why do you need the tools? You're fairly new... SwirlBoy 39 15:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't you think there are enough administrators? Microchip08 15:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What are you planning on doing as an administrator? Microchip08 15:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will make sure that Simple wikiquote becomes better but with more tools ✞Static Chr istian✞ 15:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you be more specific? Microchip08 15:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will create and fix MediaWiki pages, delete unneeded pages, etc. ✞Static Chr istian✞ 15:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which MediaWiki pages require fixing? Microchip08 15:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Any that do. I dunno. ✞Static Chr istian✞ 15:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Gwib^-(talk)- 15:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. You're making a great start here. But a look through your contributions reveals a lot of edits to userspace and talk spaces. You're a relatively new editor, and although this is a fairly small project, adminship should be earned with at least a few months of experience. Your behaviour on simple.wikipedia was also disgraceful, and we cannot have administrators acting like this, anywhere. It will take a while for me to trust you fully, perhaps six months to a year or so. Sorry. Good luck, PeterSymonds 15:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Peter, just a note: Earlier this year I was banned at enwp, and I'm an admin, but yes, the edits were disgraceful. SwirlBoy 39 15:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it didn't matter what I did at other places? Only Here? ✞Static Chr istian✞ 15:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessarily. Your behaviour on simple.wiki revealed a very immature side, which is extremely disturbing anywhere with admin tools. My oppose is also for your actions here; you're still a relatively new editor who needs more experience working with quotes. PeterSymonds 15:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Administrators represent WMF as a whole. I'll grab Creol's analogy, reply soon. Microchip08 15:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Instead of being an admin, I think StaticChristian should be banned; he has shown no signs of reform .Maxim 15:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What has he done here to warrant a ban? SwirlBoy 39 15:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah what have I done? I've been editing a lot but I havn't been inmature here. ✞Static Chr istian✞ 15:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He seems to be interested into building his userspace, not doing anything article-related; it seem it is the same thing he got banned for at en and simple wikis. And your communications don't seem to be particularly mature. Maxim 15:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you see my page I have been working on QotD. I'm not evil. ✞Static Chr istian✞ 15:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to take action yet. Please bring up on ST. AE will stand up for him. SwirlBoy 39 15:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can see this degenerating. Please keep this within the context of an RfA. He's doing good work here, whether for the right reasons or not, so talk of banning here is premature. Please keep this on the issues in question. PeterSymonds 16:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is finished. Please do not change it. You can add comments in another part.