Wikiquote

Wikiquote:Administrators/Archive 1

< Wikiquote:Administrators
This discussion is finished. Please do not change it. You can add comments to another page, but not here.

Cromwellt

I am requesting admin status at Meta because there are many things that must be done here that only an administrator can do. If you support this, please say so here. --Cromwellt|talk 04:09, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from m:Requests for permissions:

Done. — Dan | talk 18:18, 6 May 2006 (UTC) (copied by Cromwellt|talk 15:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Archer7

Archer7 has requested sysop rights on Meta. --Cromwellt|talk 21:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. He has not made any edits besides his userpage yet, but he has shown himself to be a responsible editor and admin at SEWikipedia, and we need all the help we can get. --Cromwellt|talk 21:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


User:RedSoxMan

I want to become a administrator so I can gain respect here.--RedSoxMan 02:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an obvious sockpuppet of Sir James Paul, in an attempt to change my vote. NO. If you attempt to use sockpuppets again, you will be blocked from the Simple English Wikiquote. Archer7 10:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OpposeThis person just got here and I have never seen him on any other wiki projects. --Sir James Paul 02:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sir James Paul

I want to have expirience in a small project as an sysop before becoming one on wikipedia simple english. I also want to help this project grow in the number of articles.--Sir James Paul 18:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. This project will most likely be closed soon, probably within the next few weeks. There is not really much point creating content, in my opinion at least.
  2. We don't need any more sysops. I am sysop here to sort out any immediate issues, but there aren't any because this project is dead.
  3. You haven't mastered wiki markup yet, so you simply won't be able to handle admin tools, and also admin tools give you access to more of the guts of the MediaWiki software. You need to really know far too much about wikis.
  4. Use of sockpuppets in this RfA to attempt to change my vote, and support yourself.
  5. I think that you are too obsessed with adminship. On any Wikimedia project, we only promote those that know what the title means, and I don't think you do. Admins do not police wikis, or punish people, they are simply given the ability to help clean things up a bit quicker. You seem to view this as a stepping stone to adminship on Simple Wikipedia, which just isn't true; we don't care how much adminship experience you've had on other projects. I realise that you're after some way of showing how important you are to a project, but this isn't how it works. I've got about every permission going on Simple Wikipedia, but my opinions aren't respected or trusted any more than anyone else's. Administrator, bureaucrat, steward, they all mean nothing, we'll all fight and argue with each other quite happily regardless of how many flags we have. If you really want to help a project, you mainly do that by writing or improving content, that is what makes a big difference. I'm not comfortable with you being promoted to admin while you still think that it is a position of power. You can make a real difference to the Wikimedia projects not by being an admin on as much as possible, but by being a boring old normal user; they are the ones that build up the content, and that content can go out and do quite amazing things. Archer7 23:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand that the position of sysop is not a position of power. The reason why I want to be sysop is so I can better do maitenance work here more quickly then as a editor. The quicker I am able to do it the more I will be able to do it. Even if this project closes down I will ask for a deletion review. We do need more sysops because the current sysop's are never here and I am here almost all day every day. I do not want to be a sysop for respect, I want to be one so I can do maitenance work quicker. I do not want to be a sysop for myself, I want to be one for wikiquote.--Sir James Paul 23:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support--RedSoxMan 02:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of Sir James Paul - Archer7 10:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
    • The reason why I want to become a sysop is because I want to do maitenance work in a quicker way. Unlike what archer thinks I do not want this for power, because I would not be more powerful and better than the other editors. I also do not want it for respect. I want it to help keep vandalism from becoming a problem here.--Sir James Paul 03:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • strong oppose --Dario vet 18:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

* Strong Support He seems like he wants to have this job really bad. --NY 18:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC) -- NY (talk • changes) has made few contributions outside this RfA. J Di 14:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*SupportI think he will do a great job and he will work very hard. Look at how many edits this guy has. I think he will continue to work hard as a administrator.--Don 20:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC) -- Don (talk • changes) has made few contributions outside this RfA. J Di 14:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC) * supportSupport him for the reasons above.--Superman 20:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC) -- Superman (talk • changes) has made no edits outside this RfA. J Di 14:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_adminship_is_not http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_reading_list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_Code_of_Conduct

Sir James Paul, I gave you those links as examples of things you must learn before attempting to become an admin. You must exhibit proficiency & knowledge of wiki policy & practices (such as, oh, not using sockpuppets, just as an example) before you one gains sysop status. --ZimZalaBim 14:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do know policies right now, all of them. I understand that using sockpuppets is wrong and I am sorry for using one. It is not true that I have used any other sockpuppets, I only used one. RedSoxMan. --Sir James Paul 14:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose. There are too many single purpose account votes on this RfA for it to be mere coincidence, and fact that the user has made requests for adminship on other projects recently makes me think he wants to be an administrator because he thinks adminship is a position of power or authority. The candidate could really help the projects, but after what I have seen so far I wouldn't trust him with the administrator tools anywhere unless later edits show me that he has read policies and can act appropriately in situations such as these. J Di 14:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


User:Coppertwig

I would like to have admin privileges on this project so that I can help more effectively with removing vandalism and copyright violations than I otherwise would be able to.

No one can predict the future: no one knows whether this project will continue into the future or be closed down. Meanwhile, in my opinion, adding worthwhile content and removing vandalism can help increase the chances of the project continuing. Having several administrators in the project would help ensure one is always available if the others are busy when something needs to be done. --Coppertwig 16:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Support. I really can't see the need, but you've obvioulsy thought about what I've said to you about it and still think it's worthwhile, so it's not as if you're not listening to me. Although this project is dead, what the hell. It can't do any harm. Archer7 23:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support. I have been privately corresponding with Coppertwig, and have found the user to be thoughtful, conscientious and a quick learner--just the sort of characteristics that an administrator should have. Coppertwig also has the best interests of this particular Wikimedia project at heart. I will admit that although I have been registered here for a fairly long time, I am basically a dilettante, both here and at the Simple Wikipedia (although I have some plans to get more involved at the Simple Wikipedia). I am, however, a long-term very active editor at en.wikipedia.org (almost two years and over 13,000 edits). user:BlankVerse 23:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


User:Z

This can be closed. --Z 22:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I would like to be a sysop here. The project probably isn't going to be deleted and I think I can help it grow. Thanks --Z 19:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support. Welcome, Z, and thank you for your contributions. I think it's a good idea to make User:Z an administrator. If Z is already an administrator, please put Z in the list of administrators on this page. --Coppertwig 21:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Because of what the other people said, let's not decide yet about making Z an administrator. I hope Z will continue to contribute. --Coppertwig 17:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Neutral

I don't know He has proposed meta:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Simple English Wikipedia closure for the Simple English Wikipedia and has been inactive for a long time now. But after that he didn't want to close it any more: vague. Uswibèta 05:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Oppose - This user tried to get its sister project "Simple Wikipedia" here closed on meta...shows poor judgment and will not make a good admin..--Cometstyles 06:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I changed my mind about closing the simple wikipedia. I have edited the simple English wikipedia before and am currently a admin on the Tsonga Wikipedia. I was also a temporary admin here were I reverted vandalism, blocked the vandals, and deleted an article. --Z 20:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It still has damaged trust in you. Uswibèta 06:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed a simple wikispecies. Also im not going to delete all the articles if i become an administrator. --Z 19:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can't propose a Wikispecies. There's only one domain: http://species.wikimedia.org . I have not sayed that you're going to delete all articles and pages here. Uswibèta 07:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See here first version http://species.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page_%28Simple_English%29&oldid=368679 I also made proposals to have it added in the list of languages.

Message to an administrator: please close the discussion. Maybe in the future Z will become administrator but because his proposal to close our sisterproject and his inactivity it won't happen now. Uswibèta 14:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Object I object to the closer of this proposal as you are not an administrator and can not order discussions closed. Also there are users who have not yet commented so please leave it open for 3 more days to allow further discussion. If there is no new activity it can be closed. --Z 15:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I ask for it and not close it myself. And I have no problems with it being open a few days longer. Uswibèta 10:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008

User:American Eagle

American Eagle (talk • changes)

  • Hello. I'm American Eagle, an administrator on Simple English Wikipedia. Since I came here (which was only a few weeks ago), there have not been any really active admins (Coppertwig did come on, though). I've tried to be bold here, I redesigned the Main Page and created our Wikiquote:Deletion policy. I've read through our policies (though there are only a few), and I believe I understand everything. Wikiquote needs to have an active admin (4 pages now in CAT:QDR, and if a user/IP needed a quick block, that could take a while), if I was granted adminship, I would not abuse the tools. Thank you very much. --American Eagle (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Strong Support: I'm very happy that American Eagle is helping at Simple English Wikiquote and asking to be an administrator. American Eagle makes a very large number of changes, and they're good changes, both here and at Simple English Wikipedia. Again, welcome to Simple English Wikiquote, American Eagle!
    On Simple English Wikipedia, American Eagle ...
    • ...writes good edit summaries
    • ...welcomes users [1]
    • ...and gives out barnstars [2]
    • ...is gentle about enforcing rules [3]
    • ...knows how to say "sorry": [4]
    • Giving delete buttons to someone who likes to keep pages does no harm. [5]
    • (I'm not sure whether this was vandalism or not, but nobody's perfect: [6])
    • There were 25 supports and no opposes when American Eagle asked to be an administrator at Simple English Wikipedia: [7]
      American Eagle has made many good changes in a short time here at Simple English Wikiquote, too. ☺ Coppertwig 01:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you really did a background-check on me. The second-to-last one, now that I see it again, it wasn't really vandalism, just a bit out-of-place and poorly inserted (with an Example.jpg image). So it's hard to judge, and I (apparently, I don't remember the time), chose to just keep the old version. It's good to see you on, this is such a small Wikiquote. I thank you for your support and comments, Coppertwig. --American Eagle (talk) 02:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you didn't mind the background check. I think I posted more diff links than everybody on your Simple English Wikipedia Request for Adminship together! I have to take a break for a day or so: I'm travelling. ☺ Coppertwig 15:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Strong Support No other user for the job! SwirlBoy39 13:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong support. Active user with mop experience. --TBC 15:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per above. I nominated him at Simple English Wikipedia also, and would do great here. :-) Best, RyanCross (talk) 01:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Result

Hello. This is done. A request was made by Coppertwig at the Meta wiki. I have made American Eagle an administrator here. Please let me know if any of you have any questions. ++Lar: t/c 01:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:SwirlBoy39

SwirlBoy39 (talk • changes)

  • Hi! I am SwirlBoy39. I am sort of new to Wikiquote. Well, new to editing at least but have been watching for a few months. I am a very experienced editor. I edit mainly at Simple Wikipedia. I also edit en.wikipedia and other various wikis. I do have experience with admin tools because I am a staff member on here. Staffers have CU, admin, b'crat and of course staff rights. I think it would be very helpful to have one more admin on the team. Currently there is (from what I've seen) only one active admin and American Eagle too soon. So please, consider me for the next admin here. SwirlBoy39 23:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Oppose

  • Strong oppose. You've been active here for less than a week. Also, having sysop powers on a non-WikiMedia site won't reflect your performance here.--TBC 03:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose mainly because of TBC's point. Also, I believe that is a test wiki. Just because you are a staff member there, doesn't mean you'll have experience here, a serious wiki. Wikiquote isn't a test wiki, and saying you have experience as a staff member at a test wiki makes me think a bit you'll make test edits with the tools here. Sorry, but try again next time. -- RyanCross (talk) 03:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SwirlBoy39 withdrew this request. 15:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Coppertwig (Bureaucrat)

Ended 01:52, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Coppertwing was promoted to bureaucrat by steward Rdsmith4 via meta-wiki. Maxim 01:52, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I, American Eagle, would like to nominate Coppertwig (talk • changes) for Bureaucratship. He is a great user, kind and trusted. And as we grow, we will get more administrators, and a Bureaucrat will be needed to flag them. So instead of him asking on Meta for the grant (as he did for me here), I'd like to nominate him for the task. Thank you. — American Eagle (talk) 00:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I have not decided yet whether to accept. I'm not sure if this project is big enough to need a bureaucrat yet. ☺ Coppertwig 12:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC) I accept the nomination. Thank you. ☺ Coppertwig 02:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's statement: I've been thinking about this. I think this is what I'll do: usually I won't vote in requests for administrator rights. Sometimes I may decide to vote. If I vote or if there is any other reason I think I can't be impartial, then I won't close the request. Then someone else will have to do it. If there's no other bureaucrat I'll probably ask a steward to do it. I may change my mind about these things.
If people want to know more about me, they might want to look at my RfA on English Wikipedia, which was unsuccessful with 68 support, 44 oppose and 18 neutral. Here on Simple English Wikiquote I've kept the fires smouldering for a year and a half waiting for regular users to come, and I'm very happy that now we have a number of active users, and working together we can build this place! ☺ Coppertwig 02:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Support - Coppertwig has been here for years. He has done a lot to get this site running, and I believe he'll be able to do more as a bureaucrat. I see he has great judgement and uses the consensus of the community to decide things. He'll do just fine as a bureaucrat like how he has done great as an administrator. He certainly knows our policies and he will not abuse them. He probably won't abuse the bureaucrat tools either. I'll gladly support. Best, RyanCross (talk) 00:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Less than two years. I've been here since December 2006. ☺ Coppertwig 17:45, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Heh, I should have said "almost two years". You only have a few months to go. :) Cheers, RyanCross (talk) 18:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong Support - as nominator. — American Eagle (talk) 04:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Definitely needed here and won't abuse the tools. Cheers, Razorflame 01:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. One of the most active and experienced users on this wiki.--TBC 05:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support - I can't believe it. Simple English Wikiquote is turning alive! :) By the way, can an admin create a gadget page for popups over here? Chenzw  Talk  13:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I think American Eagle is doing that, or maybe he's already done. Not sure. :) -- RyanCross (talk) 20:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    By the way, can you flag my bot once you are promoted? ^_^ Chenzw  Talk  06:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Can we close this a little early? Then we could have an active B'crat, clear up New Changes (Bots rule!), and I don't think anyone would dare oppose him, anyway. ;) Thoughts? — AE (talk) 07:22, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, close per SNOW. I will stop my bot for a while. :P Chenzw  Talk  07:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I've asked here for a steward to make him a Bureaucrat. :) — AE (talk) 07:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Heh, you might as well close and pass my RfA per WP:SNOW also soon. :P There's not very many active users here, and the only active user who hasn't !voted in my RfA yet is SwirlBoy39. If he !votes support, I think we could close my RfA early. ^_^ Besides, new users !votes won't really be counted anyway, so why bother? Thoughts? -- RyanCross (talk) 09:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmm... no, we should wait for a few more days (maybe 2?). Your RfA was started today. Stewards will be reluctant to grant the flag. Chenzw  Talk  10:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, your probably right. Sure, I'll wait. They even turned down this RfB. :/ -- RyanCross (talk) 10:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I oppose closing this earlier than August 20. I had considered suggesting moving the ending date even later, but looking at the pattern of how often various users had been editing, I decided to leave it at the original ending date that American Eagle had set. ☺ Coppertwig 13:20, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Very well then, but how about my RfA? Would we be able to close that early? Bureaucratship should take more time than adminship. I would be okay waiting a few more days, and then we can close it early then. Thoughts? Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 01:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    About your RfA: what's the hurry? There's a date for ending at the top. Not everyone has voted. People might be thinking that they can vote another day because they saw the ending date. About my RfB: I was thinking that maybe bureaucratship should take longer than adminship; that's why I had been thinking of maybe moving the date later. I decided not to suggest that, but am not opposed to moving it up to a week later if someone suggests it. But on the English Wikipedia, I think RfBs are the same length of time as RfAs. ☺ Coppertwig 02:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    <--- Then all is settled. Our RfAs and RfBs will end on the end date given. Thanks, RyanCross (talk)
    It's August 20 (my bro's birthday), I re-asked that he be flagged. — AE (talk) 01:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Comments

I've promoted Coppertwig. Congratulations to you and the community. Drop me a note if I can help with anything. Cheers Rdsmith4 01:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ☺ Coppertwig 01:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:SwirlBoy39

End date: August 27, 2008

I'm relatively new here, but on SEWP I have seen administrators at work. SwirlBoy39 (talk • changes) has the edits (200+), he knows the rules and has even tagged pages for deletion, something which is quite hard to do on a Wikipedia with about 165 articles. He's trusted both here and on SEWP. The mop would help reverting vandalism and housecleaning.

Most importantly, he edits here often, and giving him the mop would increase his edits and the quality thereof tenfold. He'll become more active on a project which needs activity. His recent 4 day editing gap was because he was sick, which also shows maturity, since he can prioritize. Basically, he has the qualities and the understanding for adminship. --Gwib -(talk)- 23:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I accept. Thank you so much Gwib. After some thinking, I've decided I don't have the experience yet. Maybe in a few months. Thanks though!
Candidate's statement: Hi there! In case you didn't know, I'm me. AKA SwirlBoy39. O am very grateful for this nomination, thank you. I have managed to rack edits up into the 200s. I find Simple WQ a great resource and I hope to make it even better. From house keeping to vandals, I'm here to help. I also have tool experience. Thank you for your time.

Support

Oppose

Comments

User:RyanCross

End date: August 23, 2008

Hello all, it's me again. :) Not that I think everybody should be granted adminship, but I would like nominate RyanCross (talk • changes) for adminship. He is a very excellent user and, through e-mail and editing here, and on Simple English Wikipedia, I trust him. He is very good at editing, knows our (and in general) policies, as well as being very good at technical things (for example, MediaWiki: namespace pages). I love to see us growing; hundreds of changes per day, several new gadgets, many new pages and growing attention here. I know what a great user he is, trust-worthy and enjoyable to work with, and I would like to nominate him for the Sysop flag. Thank you. — AE (talk) 02:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I'm very flattered by your nomination, American Eagle. I'm honored and happy to accept, hoping that this may help me serve our community, and the Simple English Wikiquote, in the best way I possibly can. :) -- RyanCross (talk) 03:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's statement: Hi there, I have had my account on Simple English Wikiquote for almost a month now and have amassed over 400 edits on the Simple English Wikiquote, and I've been actively editing for a while now. I'll be sure to do my very best as an administrator on Simple English Wikiquote if the community decides to make me one, and I will be glad to be an administrator and help the community further as one. Our wiki is quickly growing, and I'll be sure to help out in it's growth as an administrator over Wikiquote. One day, this wiki will be as big as you can imagine, and I'll be here doing my best until then, and I promise I will not abuse the tools. Thank you so kindly, RyanCross (talk) 03:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Support - as nominator. — AE (talk) 02:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Good user, good nomination, overall positive for this site :). Cheers, Razorflame 03:17, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - DUH!! Let's revive SE Wikiquote! Chenzw  Talk  03:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Strong oppose. Doesn't understand sarcasm. Weak support. Great editor, but I'd like to see a few more weeks of activity. --TBC 05:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Excellent user. Cassandra 05:25, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support - --Gwib -(talk)- 11:11, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support - great user, I've talked to him on several occasions and he definitely seems responsible enough for the tools. Jj137 03:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support - A very dedicated user. Yes, 100%. SwirlBoy39 23:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Comments

Result

Successful. RyanCross is now an administrator. ☺ Coppertwig 02:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:TBC

Scheduled to end: September 7,2008

I'd like administrative rights for certain maintenance tasks (merging page histories, deleting entries, protecting entries) and to deal with persistent vandals when other admins aren't online. I've been active here for around a month, amassing 200+ edits. I'm also an administrator on Simple English Wikipedia and Wiktionary, so I have a good grasp on administrative tasks and responsibilities. --TBC 18:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Support
Oppose
Result

Result is "Successful". TBC is now an administrator. Congratulations. ☺ Coppertwig 23:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:StaticFalcon

Scheduled to end: October 29 2008 (closed early per WQ:SNOW, 5 opposes -- American Eagle (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: self-nom

Comments

Support
Oppose
  1. Oppose, very strongly. Not suited for editing, not suited for adminship. Majorly 00:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - on any project, this user is banned or blocked elsewhere and is yet to prove himself as an editor --Matilda 00:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose very strongly – All the disruptiveness you've caused around the WikiMedia Foundation has showed me that you will not make a good administrator here (or anywhere else). – RyanCross (talk) 00:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, sorry, but you're not ready to become an admin. Sorry -- American Eagle (talk) 01:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose and suggesting speedy closure per WQ:SNOW. Chenzw  Talk  01:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion is finished. Please do not change it. You can add comments in another part.

Retrieved from "https://simple.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Administrators/Archive_1&oldid=18516"